Latest Issue
Development of Eco-Friendly Microplastic Removal Filter For Sea Salt Farm
Published: August 31,2026Flood Modeling in the Lower Mekong Basin: A 2D Hydrodynamic Approach in Cambodia
Published: August 31,2026Monitoring Water Quality in Indoor Mud Crab (Scylla serrata) Farming Systems
Published: August 31,2026Development of Oyster Sauce Using Japanese Oysters, Green Mussels, and Clams
Published: August 31,2026Analysis of Pesticide Residues in Groundwater of Agriculturally Intensive Regions of Cambodia
Published: August 31,2026Development of Soy Sauce by Using Different Molds during Koji Fermentation
Published: August 31,2026Study on arsenic removal rate of combined process of coke-bed trickling filter and sedimentation
-
1. ITC
Academic Editor:
Received: January 22,2024 / Revised: / Accepted: January 22,2024 / Available online: June 01,2019
Arsenic contamination in groundwater has been recognized as a serious issue for health and environment because arsenic is a hazardous and toxic element; therefore, developing new technology is significant to remove arsenic from groundwater. Technology of arsenic removal has been in place through research to mitigate this problem, including aeration approach, Haix absorbent, precipitation, absorption process, and membrane technology. This study aims to evaluate and investigate new method of removing arsenic by applying the combined process of coke-bed trickling filter and sedimentation. One tubewell water from Koh Thom district, Kandal province, in Cambodia was chosen for the study. The concentration of total arsenic (As-T), arsenite-arsenic (As(III)), arsenate-arsenic (As(V)), pH, Mn, and Fe were analyzed. The combined process of coke-bed trickling filter and sedimentation was conducted with four different Phases (A, B, C, D). Phase A represents the flow rate of 1.0 L/day of pumping influent groundwater sample with aeration, and without introduction of iron. Phase B represents the flow rate of 1.0 L/day of influent sample with aeration and introduction of 25 mg/l of iron added. Phase C and D represents the flow rate 1.5 L/day and 2 L/day; respectively, of influent sample with aeration and introduction of 25 mg/l of iron added. The concentration of As-T was removed in Phase A by 29%. Whereas the concentration of As-T showed high effectively removal from 80 to 86% in Phase B, C and D. Specifically, the total concentration of As decreased from 356.25 μg/L to 48.75 μg/L, 108.75 to 21.625 μg/L, and 472.5 to 75 μg/L for Phase B, C, and D; respectively. In conclusion, this combined process could be an effective technique to remove As from groundwater.
