Latest Issue
Development of Eco-Friendly Microplastic Removal Filter For Sea Salt Farm
Published: August 31,2026Flood Modeling in the Lower Mekong Basin: A 2D Hydrodynamic Approach in Cambodia
Published: August 31,2026Monitoring Water Quality in Indoor Mud Crab (Scylla serrata) Farming Systems
Published: August 31,2026Development of Oyster Sauce Using Japanese Oysters, Green Mussels, and Clams
Published: August 31,2026Analysis of Pesticide Residues in Groundwater of Agriculturally Intensive Regions of Cambodia
Published: August 31,2026Development of Soy Sauce by Using Different Molds during Koji Fermentation
Published: August 31,2026Development of Spicy Sweet Chili Sauce
-
1. Food Technology and Nutrition Research Unit, Institute of Technology of Cambodia, Russian Federation Blvd., P.O. Box 86, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Academic Editor:
Received: April 11,2021 / Revised: / Accepted: May 15,2021 / Available online: June 29,2021
The development of spicy sweet chili sauce in Cambodia is still limited although many companies have been producing this kind of product. They are facing a lot of problems related to the consistency of the sauce. The objective of this study was to develop a spicy sweet chili sauce to meet the requirement of Cambodia standard and to compare with the commercial products available in Cambodia market. To achieve this, three steps i.e. preselection of chili type (fresh chili, dried chili and a mixture of fresh and dried chili), xanthan gum concentration (0.10 %, 0.20 % and 0.25 %) and acid type (lactic acid, acetic acid and a mixture of lactic and acetic acid) were studied and two commercial products (control 1 and control 2) were selected to compare with our final product. Fresh chili, 0.20 % of xanthan gum and the mixture of lactic acid and acetic acid were selected as the best proportion for producing spicy sweet chili sauce. The viscosity (1054.0 ± 19.0 mPa.S) and total acid (4.21 ± 0.11 g/L) of the final product were not significantly different compared to the control 1 (P ≥ 0.05), but significantly lower than control 2 (P < 0.05). However, the total sugar (22.81 ± 0.6 %) and protein content (1.92 ± 0.01 %) of the final product were significantly higher than to those of the control 1 and control 2 (P < 0.05). The scores of all attributes i.e. color, consistency, garlic flavor, chili aroma, sweetness, sourness, saltiness, spiciness, and overall liking were not significantly different compared to those of the control 1 (P ≥ 0.05)and higher than those of control 2 (P < 0.05). The total plate count, yeast and mold were not detected in the product because food additives (lactic acid and acetic acid) and preservative (sodium benzoate) were added.
